CONTENTS
Introduction
What
Can I Write About?
Who
Do I Write To?
How
Do I Write It?
What
Else Should I Know?
What
Subjects are Best for the Beginning Letter Writer?
Examples
of Published Letters.
INTRODUCTION
You
might not get to give up the day job, but with a
little
practice and determination you could be on to a
nice
little earner writing readers' letters.
Word
for word, this has to be the highest paying of
writing
forms, unless of course you just happen to be one
of
the world's best selling novelists with fans waiting
in
all corners of the world for each and every word you
write. Even letters as short as a dozen words are
published
and highly paid for by almost every magazine
and
publication you could care to name, and few
publications
continue to offer the once familiar 'token'
award,
in the form of humble plastic pinny or ballpoint
pen.
Star
letters today are more likely to attract payments of
œ10
- œ25 for their writers - not a bad return for what
often
amounts to so few words, neatly, succinctly and
grammatically
entered on to a sheet of paper.
Readers'
letters, despite some improvement in their
general
status, are still not universally accepted as
falling
within the scope of traditional writing forms.
Fillers
though, often considered mini-articles, are
viewed
in an entirely different
light. Freelance writers will far more readily admit
to
submitting
fillers in an attempt to boost their normal
earnings
than they will to writing readers' letters.
There
exists however a means of working to both
disciplines,
since a great many letters pages tend to
rely
heavily on filler techniques, and so we find letters
included
which are in fact dressed up versions of
anecdotes:
rhymes, photograph submissions, jokes,
overheard
conversations and so on, all of which arguably
belong
more appropriately to the fillers section.
Almost
every magazine and newspaper, of which there are
thousands
in Britain alone, has a letters page, most
paying
for contributions; some on set themes, others
leaving
the subject matter entirely to the readers'
discretion. Awards range from œ1 to perhaps today's
highest
award - (with the exception of prize letter
writing
competitions) - the Readers' Digest œ150.
Because
potential rewards are so high, many freelance
writers
channel their entire efforts into providing text
for
the letters pages, many making a handsome living for
themselves
by doing so. A sustained degree of
success
demands
that the writer pays great attention to each and
every
letter, to the words chosen, the topic selected,
target
publication, length, and the style of writing.
The
end result is 'polished' carefully before being
written
or typed onto the best stationery at the writer's
disposal. All of this though, for the determined letter
writer,
is of little consequence until a preliminary,
careful
and rigorous market study has been made of the
publication
to which the letter will be directed.
What Can I Write About?
Look
at almost any letters page and you will notice how
vast
is the area of topics forming the basis of letters
published. Depending upon the style and viewpoint of the
magazine
or newspaper, the letters may be formal or
informal,
family-originated or business/career-related,
strongly
worded or humorous, even argumentative,
sometimes
tame. The importance of market study
will no
doubt
become evident when one considers the difference
between
the tone and style of one publication's letters,
and
those printed on another's pages.
For
most letters' pages, that experience known as 'life'
is
all that is required to find our letters selected for
regular
publication. Comments, opinions,
everyday
experiences,
all have their place on the majority of
paying
pages.
Some
editors favour comments on current affairs and
matters
of concern to the general public; others lean
towards
family anecdotes, words of wisdom from readers,
those
funny things children say, and comments from older
readers
on how things have changed since they were young.
Editors
quite naturally take great pride in publishing
letters
that comment on articles and features from past
issues,
showing of course that the magazine has a loyal,
regular
readership, and allowing them too, at least in
their
own minds , to favour the regular reader over the
freelance
writer - not always the case, but who cares if
the
cheques are forthcoming?
Your
hobbies, children, home town, job, husband, feelings
and
views, all can contribute to the letters you write,
and
unlike many writing forms you should never even
consider
it possible to run dry of things to write about.
Replies
to letters published in earlier issues are
favoured
by most editors, allowing readers to join one
another
in agreement or dissent, and showing too that
those
much-coveted regular readers are making their
presence
felt.
Who do I write to?
Decide,
before you even pick up your pen, to which
magazine
or paper you intend to write. Styles
differ
greatly
as we have already discussed, and what suits one
editor
and his or her publication will prove most
unsuitable
for another. Study as many publications
as
you
can from the newsagent's shelves, noting in
particular
the type/style/length/viewpoint and
seriousness
of the letters in their pages. Think too
just
what groups constitute the publications' readership.
Are
they older, more affluent, broad-minded, even risque?
Are
they concerned exclusively with particular hobbies,
careers
or political persuasions?
How do I write it?
Now
we must turn to the actual wording and presentation
of
our letter. It is generally accepted
that we should
begin
with the words: 'Dear Editor' as opposed to
addressing
the intended recipient by name.
In
deciding what wording shall constitute the main body
of
the letter, it is always prudent to analyse carefully
those
letters the editor has already chosen for a place
in
the pages of his or her paper or magazine.
Remember
some
publications favour short letters, some select a
sizable
proportion of rhyming contributions, some like
jokes
and quips, some instead choose only staid, serious
comments
on the more serious aspects of life.
A
letter's very beginning will very often distinguish one
chosen
for publication, to that passed over for
relegation
to the rubbish bin. Some published
examples
start
almost with a 'headline' opening, perhaps a short
statement
intended to shock or surprise, maybe just force
the
reader into continuing to the letter's end, the
latter
of course being our precise intention
from that
very
minute we pen those words 'Dear Editor'.
If the
editor
finds nothing in those first few words to prompt
him
or her to continue, the readership in general will
not
be even allowed an opportunity to assess the value of
the
words to follow.
The
very best letters tend to be, if not short, then at
least
concise - straight to the point, with not a
superfluous
word to spoil the rhythm and impact of what
it
is the writer has to say. The successful
correspondent
will ensure that every word in his or her
letter
has a part to play.
Until
your letter writing becomes more fluent, write down
in
full, all of those points you wish to make without
caring
too much about their order or actual wording.
When
you have listed all of the points concerned, then
plan
their most logical sequence within your basic
framework. Re-read your work and if it makes sense and
is
sufficiently interesting, then turn your attention to
the
actual words you will use to convey your message.
Will
you for instance use a headline opening?
If you
write
of your night spent in an hotel with a colourful
history,
will you add greatest impact by beginning:
'In
July we stayed overnight at the XXX Inn...'
or
will the editor and ultimately his readers, be more
swayed
to finish reading your work if you begin:
'Now
I know why they call that hotel's ghost The Grey
Lady.
The
very first time I saw her...!!!'
Once
into the body of your letter, try cutting the
wording
down to the barest minimum, whilst still
retaining
the essential message with that all-important
rhythm
and flow. Delete all repetitiveness
destined to
create
boredom - repetition has little part to play in
short
manuscripts other than to reiterate the most
important
of points.
Look
again at the letters published within the pages of
your
target publication. Are they
captioned? If there
is
a tendency to include a short caption to the letter
then
why not try providing it yourself? It
might end up
being
changed once it reaches publication, but the mere
fact
you have tried your hand at captioning your work
will
be sufficient to convince the editor that you have
at
least paid attention to the general requirements of
that
publication's letters page.
I've
lost count of the number of times I have been asked
whether
a typed letter will, or will not win over a
handwritten
example, and in general there really is no
satisfactory
answer. If I had to decide in favour of
one
over
the other, then perhaps I would fall on the side of
the
pensmith, but only to the extent that not all readers
will
have access to typewriters, and it may therefore be
that
a written letter will be viewed the likely work of
an
everyday reader, as opposed to a freelance writer
attempting
to boost his or her income from more
traditional
writing sources.
When
you aren't restricted by deadlines, such as the need
to
reply speedily to another reader's letter or an
editor's
invitation for readers' views on set topics,
then
it's always a good idea to put your work to one side
for
a while in order to give your mind the opportunity to
'sleep
on it for a while', with the intention of reading
your
words afresh at a later date. When you
do read your
letter
again, perhaps a week or so later, ask yourself:
Does
it make sense? Is this what I intended
to get
across?
Do
the words flow or do I stumble over any parts of the
wording?
Have
I repeated myself unnecessarily?
Would
another word or phrase be more suitable than that
which
I have chosen in my initial wording?
Can
I make it better in any way?
If
your letter still fulfils all of the requirements of
succinctness,
smooth-flow, and grammatical accuracy, as
well
as still sounding in your mind worthy of a place on
the
target publication's letters page, then write it up
on
the best paper you can find, and post it.
What Else Should I Know?
You
should never send the same letter to more than one
publication
at any particular time. Editors live in
constant
fear of discovering that a letter on their page
coincides
with one on the pages of a rival, or dare we
imagine
it, several rival magazines?
Don't
copy someone else's letter verbatim.
This is
'plagiarism'
- a much frowned upon practice of cheating
for
the writer to succumb too. You obviously
might agree
entirely
with the writer of another letter and wish to
say
as much; perhaps you wish to expand upon
your fellow
reader's
views, all of which is okay as meat for your own
letter,
but never, never, copy what one reader has
written,
with the intention of leading the editor and his
readers
to believe the work consists of entirely your own
original
thoughts.
If
after a few months you have heard nothing of your
letter's
fate, then you may safely retrieve it, perhaps
amend
or update it, and send it to another suitable
publication. Usually a space of three to six months
before
re-submission will be adequate. Some
letter
writers
believe you should wait a year before considering
an
alternative publication; in doing so they seek
obviously
to ensure their letters have the very last
ounce
of a chance of publication, without the accepting
editor
finding the letter has appeared elsewhere, and
potentially
endangering chances of future publication -
unlikely
under the circumstances that any editor would be
so
unforgiving.
In
order to keep track of items on offer, an efficient
record
system is essential so that those letters not
accepted
by one publication can ultimately be offered to
another
editor. A small record card, even a
plain white
postcard,
will suffice for each letter, with sections to
record
the contents of the letter, its date of
submission,
title or caption, target publication/s, and
so
on.
Now
a word about the writer's identity. You
will almost
certainly
start your career by writing entirely under
your
own name, but there may arise an occasion when you
wish
to submit a letter for which you do not wish to
reveal
your true identity. Perhaps you don't
genuinely
believe
what it is you write, and it is by no means
essential
to convey your real opinion. You might
though
not
want those friends and relatives who know that you
stand
for one principle to find you supporting another,
and
hence a pseudonym will disguise your true identity.
You
might also fear that as a successful writer, used to
regular
acceptances, the editor will pass your letters
over
in case accusations of favouritism should be
forthcoming. Whatever the reason you are allowed to use
a
name different to your own, even to ask that your name
is
not included at all with your letter.
You won't find
problems
in paying cheques made out to your 'pen-name'
into
your bank account; it's standard practice for
professional
writers to receive payments in names other
than
their own.
Some
letters have a great deal to gain from the
accompaniment
of a photograph. In the women's
magazines,
the
odd things children say are all the more likely to be
published
if a photo of the little rascal is provided by
which
to satisfy the imagination of the magazine's eager
readers.
In
some letters pages the photograph stands alone, and
added
words would merely detract from it.
Think for
instance
of those silly shop names, the odd signs we find
on
the highway, and so on. What for example
could I have
added
to my photograph of sheep grazing in a field,
beside
which there was placed a sign stating: 'grass
cutting
in progress' relating as it happened to the
agricultural
mower a few yards removed from my lens'
field
of vision?
What
Subjects are best for the Beginning Letter Writer?
Anecdotes: Anecdotes are short narratives of particular
incidents
or occurrences of an interesting nature, to
which
an element of humour is usually added.
Examples
include:
the things kids say, odd shop names, silly
signs,
odd and little known facts, quotations,
malapropisms,
and so on.
Verse In some magazines a letter stands a much
better
chance
of publication if the message it conveys is one
made
via the medium of verse. Some prefer
short snappy
humorous
offerings, whilst others prefer serious,
reflective
verse.
Hobbies,
Interests, etc
You
don't need to be a parachutist or deep-sea diver to
enter
your letter in this category. Anything
remotely
connected
with your leisure time can be shaped into
interesting
letters. The odd quip, joke, amusing
incident,
occurring during the course of your leisure
pursuits
makes for fascinating and profitable reading.
Your Job
Your
job, to qualify, needn't in itself be fascinating.
Odd
things that have happened to you, emotional
occurrences,
people who have influenced you, places you
have
visited, are all side-issues to your employment,
which
when written up into interesting letter form will
readily
find a place on the majority of letters pages.
Life's
Irritations, both Major and Minor
Do
you hate politicians, bureaucracy, back-seat drivers,
mothers-in-law,
neighbours? You do? Great! We all hate
the
very same things sometimes. Get your pen
out and
give
us a chuckle, or simply cause for thought.
Pets/Children/Husband/Wife/Friends/Neighbours,
etc
Don't
you just hate it when they suggest we shouldn't
love
our pets as much as we do? So do I, and
because of
this,
I once won a star letter prize by voicing my
preference
for the company of my beloved boxer dog, when
incensed
by a fellow-reader's letter, which suggested we
non-mother-dog-lover
types keep our pets purely as 'Child
substitutes'. Come to think of it, now that I have got
the
kids, I wonder if a follow-up letter might be
necessary
to reinforce my earlier point that 'kids are
kids,
and dogs - are simply wonderful!'
Sarcasm
to one side, you do get the point don't you, that
subjects
of such everyday importance can still give rise
to
powerful, prize-winning letters?
Seasonal
and Anniversary Related Topics eg stories of
Christmases
long ago, Easter customs in other parts of
the
world, birthdays - and how differently they are
perceived
once we start getting that little bit older.
Television and Radio
Well,
is it bad for us? I for one find those
dreaded
'Turtles'
on the telly are just the thing for plonking
the
kids in front of when I want them to eat every ounce
of
their dinners. Every spoonful
incidentally goes in
without
a thought as to the taste - TURTLES RULE on my
TV!
So
you see, your comments on television and radio can be
made
even if in reality you've never looked at the screen
or
tuned in to a station, and subsequently even the
seemingly
most mundane of topics can be used to good
effect
for future correspondence.
Famous
and Infamous People
Have
you met any? Were they as you expected?
Money
Something
that concerns us all. Have you thought
of
novel
ways of saving it, making it? You
have? Do tell!
Examples
of Published Letters (All early 1991)
Jingle
Jangles
I
do wish advertisers would stop using ringing telephones
in
their TV ads. My phone is in the hall,
and many's the
time
I've dashed out to answer it only to realise that no
one's
calling me. It's just the TV. It's very
frustrating
and annoying.
Listen
Very Carefully....'
Overheard
in the checkout queue: 'Now listen very
carefully
to this. I promised not to repeat it, so
I can
only
tell you once!"
A
Gun Dog
My
four-year-old daughter, Amy, was telling her aunt all
about
her best friend's lovely new dog.
"He's a golden
revolver",
she declared with solemn confidence.
Turtle
Trio
(With
photograph of three children) Here are my own
'radical'
three young men, modelling their new Turtle
jumpers. Jonathan, William and Thomas all say
'Cowabunga!' Thanks, Woman's Own! (Follow-up to a recent
knitting
pattern for sweaters)
Overheard
"It's
all right, it's a menthol one!"
- Health store
assistant
smoking a cigarette while reassuring a
customer.
Perfect
Start
The
manager of our local butcher's shop has had the
brilliant
idea of selling individual breakfast packs.
Each
pack contains an egg, a large slice of bacon, a
square
of sausage, a slice of black pudding and a potato
scone. This costs only 50p and is ideal for anyone
who
is
on their own.
Fault! Martina!
(Follow-up
to a recent feature)
Martina
Navratilova claims that money has ruined tennis.
She's
right, but she's one of the ones mainly to blame.
Your
article mentions her earnings from sponsorships,
etc.,
and she intends to continue making money ....
Marse
(In
reply to earlier feature)
Indeed
it's an absolute farce,
To
tell us we've got to say Marse!,
Those
delectable bars,
Will
always be Mars,
With
nothing to touch them for class.
Show
House
If
you really hate doing the housework and just can't get
motivated
to get on with it, try telling yourself you're
cleaning
up to sell the house. It's amazing what
you'll
do
if you think there are strangers coming to look
around!
Self-Service
I
always enjoy your Pic of the Week, especially the silly
signs. I once saw a roadside notice that boggled my
mind. It read: 'Bagged Manure, 20p. Do It Yourself,
10p!'
So
Necessary
I know
too well the necessity for breast screening.
I
went
along for a test and found out that I had cancer and
yet
didn't have any of the signs or symptoms........
Spelling
Out Disaster
Having
worked with people in their late teens and early
20s,
I'm appalled by the poor standards of education,
speech
and literacy. Some examples I noted were
Sidnum
for
Sydenham, colidge for College and ........ ??!
No comments:
Post a Comment